.bk A12
.fl K710jl.j
.fd journal entries K709-10
.ei jl
.ed K710

.rd K709
.ri jl

f 313
tc co f314

f 314
tc co f318

f 318
tc co f319

f 316
tc co f317

f 259
tc co f316

f 309
tc ab f315

f 310
tc co f315

f 311
tc co f315

f 312
tc co f315

f 308
tc co f320

f 307
tc co f308

f 322
tc si f319

f 323
tc si f319

f 316
tc co f324

f 325
tc ab f321

f 327
tc si f316

f 320
tc co f328

f 329
tc bo f316

.rd K710

k 27
dy Today has brought some unusual surprises.  We removed the pit f325 this morning and began digging the locus.  We soon saw the outline of an area of slightly grayer earth in the SW corner, which intersects both the mud wall and the S baulk.  The earth within it is slightly harder than the rest of the ^ac.  Also, in the SE corner, there is evidence of a red layer, a black layer, and another red layer in a ring, the outer two of which are about 20cm wide.  It is possible that these are vertical layers, cut almost horizontally by us.  Finally, there are more strange vertical fissures in the N half of the locus, much small than the main one of f321.

q 600
nt This lot contained part of a Ninevite V small vessal, along with q-lots 385 and 384.

q 585
nt This lot contained part of a Ninevite V small vessal, along with q-lots 384 and 400.

q 584
nt This lot contained part of a Ninevite V small vessal, along with q-lots 385 and 400.

f 329
ds At first, we thought that this was separate from f316 because we found very little pottery for a brief period, but it turned out to equal f316.  Since I did not observe it, I cannot explain this situation.
=l f316