.bk J01
.fl U828.j
.fd General additions
.ed U828
.ei lC
.rd U828
.ri lC

^ esc2
ar In fact it seems strange that an escarpment built of dumping material, even if much bigger and higher than the previous one, could protect the base of the wall. It is possible that what we see today, i.e. a very irregular installation at the beginning was more regular and with an harder surface. Mittani accumulations are abutting it, so it lasted for a very long period.

f 259
ar The wall is inclined to the west and it is impossible it was built freestanding. As shown by v425 any cut is visible in the accumulations found behind it. But it seems that a cut with a filling is visible more to the north (v). So probably the old accumulations to the west of the wall were removed by water erosion that brought new material against it. The erosion should be very strong from the west to damage the first escarpment, the LC structures.

^ wall3
ar The wall is inclined to the west and it is impossible it was built freestanding. As shown by v425 any cut is visible in the accumulations found behind it. But it seems that a cut with a filling is visible more to the north (v). So probably the old accumulations to the west of the wall were removed by water erosion that brought new material against it. The erosion should be very strong from the west to damage the first escarpment, the LC structures.

f 239
ad accumulation D

f 189
ad accumulation D

f 244
ad Accumulation C

f 272
ad Accumulation D

f 294
ad accumulation D

f 296
ad bricks

f 297
ad bricks

f 299
ad accumulation D

f 303
ad accumulation B

f 305
ad accumulation B

f 306
ad accumulation B