.bk J01 .fl Y311cJC.j .fd additions and notes regarding qp and additional notes and fixes for the UGR (views, etc) .ri cJC .rd Y311 q 340-p16 fo This sherd was described as both FC and RC ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 406-p7 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 487-p2 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. ;q 507-p17 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both CH and G ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. ;q 514-p10 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both M and G ware, which are similar in appearance. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 601-p9 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. ;q 648-p10 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both IM and G ware, which are similar in appearance. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. ;q 677-p3 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both IM and G ware, which are similar in appearance. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 706-p13 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 726-p4 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 742-p1 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 757-p3 fo The ware on this drawing was changed during the recording process to G, as is evident on the pencil drawing. It should most likely be considered G ware. ;q 772-p1 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both G and FC ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 776-p14 fo This sherd was recorded as both CH and RC ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 783-p5 fo This sherd was recorded as both FC and CH ware, which can be similar in appearance. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. ;q 789-p22 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both CH and G ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 795-p10 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 801-p1 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. ;q 811-p4 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both FC and G ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 813-p1 fo This sherd was recorded as both CH and RC ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. ;q 817-p9 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both FC and G ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. ;q 817-p15 ;fo This sherd was recorded as both IM and G ware, which can be similar in appearance. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 828-p1 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 849-p4 fo This sherd was recorded as both RC and CH ware. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 850-p4 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 864-p18 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 870-p4 fo This sherd was recorded as both FC and CH ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 871-p9 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 876-p1 fo This sherd was recorded as both FC and CH ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 877-p66 fo This sherd was recorded as both RC and CH ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 887-p2 fo This sherd was recorded as both RC and CH ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 1033-p9 fo This sherd was recorded as both WS and S ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 1033-p11 fo This sherd was recorded as both RC and RC1 ware, which 108 appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 1034-p3 fo There is a discrepency between the text categorization of this sherd (collared grooved rim) and the designation on the drawing (bowl - straight). This may be as one person classified it by specific rim type while the other used more general shape. q 1078-p14 fo This sherd was recorded as both RC and RC1 ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 1097-p1 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1112-p19 fo This sherd was recorded as both WS and S ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 1117-p19 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1136-p11 fo This sherd was recorded as both LC and FC. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. In this case, LC is not technically a ware, although LCH is - it seems likely this is really an FC sherd. q 1167-p6 fo The notes on this sherd indicate it is a "two mouth jar", although only one rim is preserved in the drawing. q 1168-p1 fo This sherd was recorded as both LC and ETC. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. In this case, LC is not technically a ware, although LCH is - it seems likely this is really an ETC sherd. q 1168-p3 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1176-p11 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1181-p2 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1216-p6 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1247-p4 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1308-p7 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1312-p3 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. .rd S917 .ri mKB .ei cJC .ed Y320 q 864-p15 ds finer type of gray ware, burnished on exterior and on the short body wall above the carination, inside rough, sand temper. q 1052-p10 ds coarse type gray ware, space burnished on interior and over rim, coarse on exterior but some burnishing present, chaff, mica, mineral temper (mica more visible against the darker background of teh coarse variety of gray ware). Small round sided bowls. q 869-p1 ds finer type of gray ware but coarser n section than most of the examples of this finer type. small carinated bowls characteristic for finer type of gray ware. q 1086-p6 ds dark gray coarse type of gray ware, space burnished on interior and exterior, chaff, mica and sand temper. q 446-p5 ds light gray on exterior and interior similar to the finer type of gray ware but matrix is red-brown not gray, therefore may be a type of the finer variety of gray ware or not gray ware at all, finger prints on the exterior but interior seems to have wheel marks (ie probabbly not handmade), sand and mica temper, burnished on exterior. .ri cJC .rd Y321 q 1136-p1 nt This sherd was classified as both a conical cup and a straight sided bowl. It is on the cusp of the size between the two, so could be classified either way. q 1136-p2 nt This sherd was classified as both a conical cup and a straight sided bowl. It is on the cusp of the size between the two, so could be classified either way. q 218-p4 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 375-p13 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 401-p69 nl This sherd drawing originally had no p# and was thus assigned to -p69. In the future if the descriptions of the sherds from this qlot become available it may be possible to match this sherd to one of those descriptions and then the drawing could be relabled to the proper p#. q 651-p7 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing (7cm/28cm). Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 840-p5 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing (24cm/13cm). Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 877-p5 fo This sherd was recorded as both CH and FC ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 894-p10 O99 This sherd is a jar shoulder, but was accidentally drawn as if a base. The drawing should be viewed with the sherd in an upright position. q 1195-p1 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 588-p1 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 475-p23 fo This sherd was recorded as both RC1s and FC ware, which can appear similar. Generally the text descriptions are considered with more weight than those recorded on the drawings. q 529-p10 fo Slight discrepency in the shape description for this sherd(xf and xfx codes). q 651-p7 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1136-p21 pb This sherd is a base but was incorrectly drawn as a body sherd. q 1203-p7 pb This sherd is a base but was incorrectly drawn as a body sherd. q 1230-p28 pb The drawing of this sherd is tilted on the wrong axis q 1232-p2 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1279-p1 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement. q 1194.1 sh b ZcaS1 cr qc 1 q 1169.12 sh b w1 12 qc 1 q 1168.8 sh b w1 25 qc 1 q 1138.1 w1 10 qc 1 sh j q 755.1 sh b ZcaS1 d qc 3 nt reconstructed from 3 sherd fragments ZcaS4 t w1 23 q 644.1 sh b ZcaS1 d qc 1 q 162.1 sh b ZcsA1 r qc 1 w1 16 q 126.1 sh c qc 1 q 82.4 sh d qc 1 q 68.1 ds On the pencil drawing for this sherd it was identified as "ovis" q 28.4 sh b w1 20 qc 1 pr Additional information was added to this record based on the accompanying drawing w 50 gf 239,243,235,232,231 gk 117 gk 103 ds Eastern baulk of k117, showing f239 go E w 49 gf 232,235,237,189,195,196,189,72,248 gk 117,103 ds East baulk k117, k103 go E v 282a gf 196,239 gk 127 go E ds Showing f239 v 331a ds Close-up showing bricky material of f294. See main view, v331 for more context. gf 294 gk 127 .rd z107 f 60 li Descriptive information for this feature is missing. These photos remain as f60 was noted as being included in thse views, however, I believe it is more likely that f60 was incorporated into A19 (see Errors under J1 excavations to the left). .rd Z713 .ri cJC q 1257.1 df bowl sh b wm S w1 14 w2 7 .rd Z729 .ri cJC q 537 tc si f0 ds according to field log this material was collected from shafat (mixed) and assigned to f0 q 539 ds according to field log this material was collected from shafat (mixed) and assigned to f0 q 1141 ds information regarding this qlot including localization and feature was lost q 462-p27 ha This sherd was identified as two different wares over the course of analysis. Both wares are preserved here. q 462-p37 ha This sherd was identified as two different wares over the course of analysis. Both wares are preserved here. q 563-p10 ha Two wares were recorded for this drawing, one on the drawing and one during the analysis. Both are preserved here. q 814-p37 ha The two different wares represent differences in interpretation by mKB and hH of the reddish sherd which is either a redder version of WS or a Red Orange Calcite. q 862-p3 fo A discrepency appears between the diameter recorded in the sherd analysis and on the drawing. Hammade's (hH) text recording is generally considered to be the correct measurement.