.bk J02 .fl T916cjc.j .fd reasons for strata assignment .rd T916 .ri cJC list2 f I10 ;338 Part of the large Mittani brickfall, dated to the middle Mittani based on the dating of erosion to the early Mittani. ;340 Part of large Mittani brickfall ;341 Part of the large Mittani brickfall, dated to the middle Mittani based on the dating of erosion to the early Mittani. ;342 Part of the large Mittani brickfall, dated to the middle Mittani based on the dating of erosion to the early Mittani. 345 Inside the Mittani brickfall and thus dated to the same stratum. 356 Part of the large Mittani brickfall, dated to the middle Mittani based on the dating of erosion to the early Mittani. 334 Before the Mittani brickfall that comes up against the wall. Corresponds in time with other curtain walls. 335 Based on ceramics, this feature is mixed EDIII and Mitanni but the Mitanni remains are probably introduced through the construction of the wall, not originally part of this deposit. Additionally, there are very few Mitanni sherds so this feature is understood to be an EDIIIB deposit. 336 Based on ceramics, this feature is mixed EDIII and Mitanni but the Mitanni remains are probably introduced through the construction of the wall, not originally part of this deposit. Additionally, there are very few Mitanni sherds so this feature is understood to be an EDIIIB deposit. 337 Elevation 339 Assigned to the same stratum as the erosion (f366) that presumably created this feature. 346 This feature is stratigraphically before the Mittani brickfall that comes up against the wall. It corresponds in time with other curtain walls. 349 Directly under the wall f334, it is presumably built at the same time as a foundation 351 It is inside of wall f346, which is assigned to the this strata based on its stratigraphic relationship to the brickfall. 352 This deposit is thought to be the same as the f335 and thus is assigned to the same stratum, despite being associated with the wall f334, which is dated to the Mitanni. 354 This feature is possibly the same erosion and water damage that formed f339 and f371 and is thus assigned to the same feature. 366 Because the Mittani brickfall rests directly on this feature, it must have been created in the phase immediately preceding the brickfall. 371 Probably part of f339, this feature is associated with early Mittani erosion. 344 Based on ceramics dated to EDIIIB 347 Floor above (f344) dated to EDIII with ceramics and floor below (f359) is also EDIII so all layers between were also assigned to EDIII based on stratigraphy. 350 Floor above (f344) dated to EDIII with ceramics and floor below (f359) is also EDIII so all layers between were also assigned to EDIII based on stratigraphy. 353 Floor above (f344) dated to EDIII with ceramics and floor below (f359) is also EDIII so all layers between were also assigned to EDIII based on stratigraphy. 355 Floor above (f344) dated to EDIII with ceramics and floor below (f359) is also EDIII so all layers between were also assigned to EDIII based on stratigraphy. 357 Dated to transitional EDIIIA-EDIIIB based on ceramics. 358 Dated to transitional EDIIIA-EDIIIB based on ceramics. 360 Same as features in k110 which are all assigned to EDIII 361 Same as features in k110 which are all assigned to EDIII 362 Same as features in k110 which are all assigned to EDIII 363 Same as features in k110 which are all assigned to EDIII 364 Same as features in k110 which are all assigned to EDIII 365 Same as features in k110 which are all assigned to EDIII ;367 Fill of cut assigned to s59-J2A, it belongs to the same strata 370 Sits inside EDIII features identified by ceramics and stratigraphy 372 Based on elevation, this feature is assigned to the same strata as those immediately around it. 375 Sits inside EDIII features identified by ceramics and stratigraphy 376 This feature has transitional EDIIIA-B accumulations above and below it and is part of EDIII use and erosion in front of the apron. 127 Appears to be a later construction, an addition to the apron. It is probably dated to this strata as this is the only phase where major modifications were made to the temple terrace in all JP. There is no specific data from J2 to support assignment to this strata but based on comparison with J1 and the building of the second escarpment it fits with the general development of the temple terrace. 348 Assumed to be the same as floor f379 which is from a more stratified context based on the matrix and composition of the feature. 359 Dated to transitional EDIIIA-B based on ceramics and connections with the apron. 373 Same as f359 ;377 Forms subfloor of f359 which is assigned to strata s59-J2A ;379 Forms subfloor of f359 which is assigned to strata s59-J2A ;368 Stratum assigned based on assumption that this may be the first floor associated with construction of the apron which is dated to strata s59-J2A ;369 Stratum assigned based on assumption that this may be the first floor associated with construction of the apron which is dated to strata s59-J2A ;374 Stratum assigned based on assumption that this may be the first floor associated with construction of the apron which is dated to strata s59-J2A ;378 Stratum assigned based on assumption that this may be the first floor associated with construction of the apron which is dated to strata s59-J2A 381 Accumulation above the presumed first floor associated with apron ;382 Cuts from above and through pebble floors that date to strata s60a-J2A 383 Associated with cut f382 384 Associated with cut f382 385 Associated with cut f382 386 Dated to EDIIIA based on ceramics 387 Dated to EDIIIA based on ceramics 388 Dated to EDIIIA based on ceramics 389 Dated to EDIIIA based on ceramics ;390 Although this feature was not excavated it is immediately below the s60a-J2A floors (f389,f388) and so is assigned to the same stratum. ;391 Although this feature was not excavated it is immediately below the s60a-J2A floors (f389,f388) and so is assigned to the same stratum. 343 Unassigned, includes backfill from cement staircase. ;380 Unsure, based solely on information from J1 which suggests earlier LC constructions. There is no information from J2 to date this feature.