.bk J05
.fl U807mM1.j
.fd feature elevation discrepancies
.fn edited by jW on U812
.ei mM1
.ed U807
.rd U807
.ri mM1

f 16
D99 The measured bottom elevation (9169) exceeds the top (9145), which is impossible. The feature f9, which covers f16, has a bottom elevation of 9169. Therefore I conclude that the elevation of the top and the bottom are probably reversed. While the top should be 9169, the bottom should have a measurement of 9145.  

f 18
D99 The measured bottom elevation (9306) exceeds the top (9291), which is impossible. The bottom elevation of the first q-lot has a top measurement of 9291 and a bottom elevation of 9273. Therefore I conclude that the measured top elevation is correct, while the bottom one is in error and should be about 9273. 

f 22
D99 The measured bottom elevation (9258) exceeds the top (9174), which is impossible. The top measurement of q28 is 9174, while the ending elevation is 9159, therefore I conclude that the measured top elevation is correct, while the bottom one is in error and should be about 9159. 

f 34
D99 The measured bottom elevation (9118) exceeds the top (9116), which is impossible. f33 covers f34 and has a bottom measurement of 9116. Therefore I conclude that the top elevation of f34 is correct, while the bottom one is in error, but cannot be estimated.

f 55
D99 The measured bottom elevation  (9245) exceeds the top (9136), which is impossible. Examinations of the q-lots show, that the highest top is 9261 (q73), while the lowest bottom is 9250 (q68). Therefore I conclude, that both of the elevations can not be right. The top measurement must be about 9261, while the bottom has to be at least lower than 9250. 

f 70
D99 The measured bottom elevation (9091) exceeds the top (9090), which is impossible. The bottom elevation of f63, which covers f70, is 9090 and also the starting elevation of the first q-lot 240 is 9090, while the top elevation of f128, which is covered by f70, is 9051. Therefore I conclude that the top elevation of f70 is correct, while the bottom should be about 9051. 

f 98
D99 The measured bottom elevation (9107) exceeds the top (8657), which is impossible. The feature f94, which covers f98, has a bottom elevation of 9121, while the feature f100, which is covered by f98, has a top elevation of 9107. Therefore I conclude that the measured elevations are in error. The top elevation of f98 should prabably be about 9121, while the elevation of the bottom should be about 9107.   

f 121
D99 The measured bottom elevation (9072) exceeds the top (9068), which is impossible. The feature f122, which covers f121, has a bottom elevation of 9072. Threfore I conclude that the elevation of the top and the elevation of the bottom could have been reversed. That means that the bottom should have a meausrement of 9068, while the top should be 9072.    

f 250
D99 The measured bottom elevation (8913) exceeds the top (8906), which is impossible. f246 covers f250 and has a bottom-measurement of 8906, while the q-lots q384, q385 and q386 have bottom-elevations of 8876, therefore I conclude that the measured top elevation was right, while the bottom one was in error and should have been about 8876. 

f 278
D99 The measured bottom elevation (8772) exceeds the top (8771), which is impossible.  The first of three q-lots (q451) from this accumulation has a top elevation of 8771, while the last q-lot (q455) has a bottom elevation of 8747.  Therefore we conclude that the measured top elevation was correct, while the bottom one was in error and should have been about 8747.