.bk A14
.fl N910jl.j
.fd journal entries
.ed N910
.ei jl

.ri jl
.rd N910

r 316
nv m1 for this relay was written in the relay log as m3328.  When the relay had no solution, I changed m1 to m3327, on the possibility that rd2 had entered the wrong marker number.  At that time, the relay plotted in approximately the right position.  For that reason, I believe that m3327 was the proper m1 value and have left it that way.

r 317
nv m1 for this relay was written in the relay log as m3328.  When the relay had no solution, I changed m1 to m3327, on the possibility that rd2 had entered the wrong marker number.  At that time, the relay plotted in approximately the right position.  For that reason, I believe that m3327 was the proper m1 value and have left it that way.

k 89
nv v83 is our first view of k89, after the area was cleared, but before the locus had been properly laid out and measured.  Therefore, it is deceptive, in that it makes k89 appear larger than it really is.  v86 shows the locus much better, with the blue string along the western edge marking the actual boundary of the locus (laid out following the eastern edge of k1).

r 315
nv Judging by its position when plotted, as compared to the other k89 relays, r315 is incorrect.  However, since most of the markers in A14 were removed when we excavated the baulks at the end of the season, we cannot currently retake the relay.  It may be assumed that the correct location for r315 is along the line between r312 and r317.