.bk A14
.fl N916jl.j
.fd journal and log entries
.ed N916
.ei jl

.ri jl
.rd N916

q 362
nv The recorded elevation for this q-lot (and for r283, from which the elevation was taken) was m3003 81-128.  Upon calculation and comparison with surrounding q-lots and features, it became clear that this elevation was incorrect.  Therefore, the elevation marker has been emended to m3005, which produces a more correct elevation and which, based on the other markers used in the relay, was probably the actual marker used for the elevation, rather than m3003.

r 283
nv The recorded elevation for this relay was m3003 81-128.  Upon calculation and comparison with surrounding q-lots and features, it became clear that this elevation was incorrect.  Therefore, the elevation marker has been emended to m3005, which produces a more correct elevation and which, based on the other markers used in the relay and the relative locations of the markers versus the relay location, was probably the actual marker used for the elevation, rather than m3003.

q 303
nr This q-lot was originally labelled f97.  Upon checking it against the relays and date, I discovered that this was probably a mistake, and that it was probably in f99.  Therefore, I have changed the relay log, the archive, and the bag ribbons from f97 to f99.

q 304
nr This q-lot was originally labelled f97.  Upon checking it against the relays and date, I discovered that this was probably a mistake, and that it was probably in f99.  Therefore, I have changed the relay log, the archive, and the bag ribbons from f97 to f99.

r 159
nv This relay was originally labelled as the south-east corner of q303.  However, upon plotting the relay, it became clear that it was probably the north-east corner of the q-lot, and that the error was caused by amm's confusion about the names of the cardinal directions in English.  Therefore, I have emended the relay log, the q-log, and the archive to reflect this correction.

r 160
nv This relay was originally labelled as the south-east corner of q304.  However, upon plotting the relay, it became clear that it was probably the south-west corner of the q-lot, and that the error was caused by amm's confusion about the names of the cardinal directions in English.  Therefore, I have emended the relay log, the q-log, and the archive to reflect this correction.