.bk J04
.fl U211SC.j
.fd on J04 _add info at features already done while doing the strata assignment
.ei sC
.ed U211

.rd U211
.ri sC

f 123
c# 10YR 7/4 
co very pale brown
c# 10YR 8/2 
co very pale brown

f 157
;top not 9352@top
el not excavated@bottom
;c# MISSING
;co MISSING

f 66
hd compact
tx soft
co light brown
;c# MISSING
co light brown
wm clay
tx very fine
el 91.94 (not real bottom of f)@bottom
nr The real bottom of this feature has not been reached, since we stop digging in this locus. Therefore, 91.94 does not correspond to the real bottom elevation of f66.

f 109
nr It is the same of f66, but it has been labeled separately since it is the accumulation below stone f108.
;c# MISSING
co light brown
wm clay
tx very fine

f 111
nr It is the same of f66, but it has been labeled separately since it is the accumulation below a isolated limestone (f110).
;c# MISSING
co light brown
wm clay
tx very fine

f 105
;c# MISSING
co light brown
wm clay
tx very fine

f 67
co light brown
wm clay
tx soft
tx very fine

f 113
nr It is the same of f66, but it has been labeled separately since it is the accumulation below f62, a isolated limestone within k64.
c# 10YR 7/3
co very pale brown
wm clay
tx very fine

f 90
nr The real bottom of this feature has not been reached, since we stop digging in this locus. Therefore, 90.84 does not correspond to the real bottom elevation of f90.

f 59
nr The real bottom of this feature has not been reached, since we stop digging in this locus. Therefore, 91.16 does not correspond to the real bottom elevation of f59.

f 64
el 9119 @bottom
nr The real bottom of this feature has not been reached, since we stop digging in this locus. Therefore, 91.19 does not correspond to the real bottom elevation of f64.

f 163
nr The real bottom of f163 (which, has been found broken in several fragments, some of which are slightly oblique, and most of the smallest fragments scattered around the biggest) has not been reached, since we stop digging in this locus. Therefore, 91.19 is related with the bottom elevation reached in this locus during this excavation season and does not correspond to the real bottom of the feature. The largest tannur fragment, togheter with the scattered pieces located around it, are unlikely to be in a primary use context.