.bk J06
.fl S806pc.j
.fd dy journal
.ed S806
.ei pc
.rd S806
.ri pC

-dy Today we excavated in k85, k75 and k74: we exposed everywhere the glacis, which is probably the same as f63 in k84. Today i realized that we forget to string the northern baulk of k85: we missed ca 40 cm, because the bottom elevation of the last drawing of the North baulk is 90.00 and the top elevation of the actual North baulk is 89.56 (f98 West baulk, which is at the same elevation of the North baulk). Today we begin to excavate in k87, which is not a real locus, but only 1.5m baulk: it is located East of k200 and south of the narrow k86. It will allow to remove the high and dangerous East section of k200, which is partly eroded, being exposed for several years. This will also allow us to have a section which shows the stratigraphy in the area between area C2 and J6. 
-sg Today we exposed in all loci (k75, k85, k74) the glacis, which slopes toward South-West

k 87
ds k87 is not a real locus, but only 1.5m baulk: it is located East of k200 and south of the narrow k86. Is defined by markers m4763, m4809, m4762, m4801, m4783
dy today we started remove the first 1.50m: we remove it with the big pick and by pushing the dirt into k200. We treat it as a baulk, therfore we assign one feature each 2m.

k 85
dy Today we removed all the brickfall f86 and the ash f90. They cover the glacis f110, but the brickfall overlays the ash. f90 is the same as f97 in k75 and the ash is visible in the East section of k200, where is located under the brickfall. 

k 84
dy today we removed the northern part of the East baulk of k84, which is f108

k 75
dy Today we partly exposed the glacis f109, which is located directly under the ash f97 

k 74
dy Today we removed all the brickfall f103 and we exposed the glacis f107, which is the same as f63, f109, f110

f 103
tc co f107

f 97
tc co f109

f 86
tc ov f110

f 90
tc ov f110