1. OVERVIEW
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constituent label to which relay applies | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | k89 [Input: N909JL.R] |
3. STRATIGRAPHY
Volumetric Localization
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relay definition | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | outline of locus [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Relay location on element | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | south-east corner [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Method of measurement | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | taped [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Origin of tie 1 | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | m3327 [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Origin of tie 2 | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | m3351 [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Origin of elevation | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | m3351 [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Tie 1 | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | 500 [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Tie 2 | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | 441 [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Tie to elevation | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | 135 [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Height @top | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | 86 [Input: N909JL.R] |
| Notes on volumetric localization | 2003-09-10 | jl | m1 for this relay was written in the relay log as m3328. When the relay had no solution, I changed m1 to m3327, on the possibility that rd2 had entered the wrong marker number. At that time, the relay plotted in approximately the right position. For that reason, I believe that m3327 was the proper m1 value and have left it that way. [Input: N910JL.j] |
4. TYPOLOGY
Items Field Record
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Field definition | 2003-08-11 | rd2 | locus [Input: N909JL.R] |