16
Main
Roster
|
Synopsis A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A21 A22 A30 A35 |
B1 B2 B10 B11 B12-13 B20 B21 B22 BA |
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 |
D1 D2 D3 D4-18 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 |
D9 D10-16 D10 D11 D12 D13 D14 D15 D16 D17 |
D18 D19 E1 E2 E3 E4 E99 F1 F2 F3 |
G1 G3-19 G3 G4 G5 G10-13 G10 G11 G12 G13 |
G14 G15 G16 G17 H1 H2 H3 I1 I2-4 I5 |
I6 I10 I11 I12 J1-7 J8 J9 J10 J11 K1 |
K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7 K8 K9 K10-11 K12-13 |
K14 K15 K16 K17 L1 L2 M1-3 N1 N2 N3 |
N4 N5 O0 O1 O2-19 O21 O22 O23 O30 P1 |
P2 P3 P4 P5 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Alphab.List |
In practical
terms, the roster may be viewed as a checklist of pertinent headings under which
observations are to be entered. Conceptually, the roster spells out the full
range of possible variables which, together, define any given constituent. In
another respect, however, the conceptual import of the roster is more
significant, since it constitutes the structural backbone of the entire
observational system that is brought to bear on the evidence as it is collected.
The roster categories ought in fact to reflect a structural and systemic
framework which matches a priori considerations, all the while being rooted in
the concrete dynamics of practical observations. In other words, the roster is
built at the same time on the inductive observation of facts and on the
deductive argumentation of principles.
That is to say
that the concept of roster is at the core of the concept of grammar, somewhat
like paradigms are for a linguistic grammar. A paradigm is of course based on
the reality of a spoken language, but it is at the same time a predictive
structural component of what is called in Saussurian terms the “langue.”
The Main Roster, like any other roster, is subject to ongoing revisions and updates. As a result, it is indispensable to tie both the sequence of roster slots (variants) and their respective contents (variables) to a specific versions of the Roster and the Lexicon. The version described here is the fifth one for the Main Roster. The code for it is: Zmr-005.
The code for the current version appears next to date and initials after each entry of the archive.
The five major categories under which the variables are subsumed serve a descriptive function only, and are used in the ordering of the roster.
The first such category, identification, is external to the analysis proper: the variables of this type serve, on the one hand, to amplify the information provided already by the label given to the constituent, and, on the other, to specify the nature of the same constituent, including, where necessary, its breakdown into components.
The second category, stratigraphy, is obviously the single most important one. It includes data pertaining to both emplacement and deposition, and is the one that must be followed most accurately, and in timely fashion, i.e., during the excavation proper. The obvious reason is that most of these attributes cannot be observed after the excavation of that particular element is completed.
Some aspects of typology are also to be observed directly in the field, in particular measurements and descriptions of features that are to be removed, such as floor accumulations. Typology of items and q-lots, on the other hand, is generally best recorded in the laboratory after the excavation process is completed. However, basic observations in the field are necessary, primarily to provide a safeguard in case labels get detached from the item or lots at any time during the process of analysis. It is also for this category that secondary rosters are generally designed.
A variety of different treatments is brought to bear on the material excavated, both in the field and in laboratories away from the field house. The Main Roster includes only conservation, because this is the one treatment that is in fact obligatory for any element that is otherwise in danger of deterioration. Our entries describe the intervention, or need thereof, that may result in the modification of the element as found. Other types of treatment, that may include such diverse categories as soil analysis in the field or thermoluminescence in a remote laboratory, require more specialized rosters, and are in fact generally presented as text files corresponding to the laboratory report.
Finally, the category of reference supplies external information that is overlaid, as it were, to the original constituent. In this respect, “reference” is somewhat parallel to “identification,” in that it provides a tracking record of the constituent all the way down to its physical disposition and the chain of documentary and interpretive follow-ups in publication.
In what follows, I will explain only those variables which are not immediately obvious, and will provide a minimum of exemplification as needed. Purpose of the presentation given here is to explain the format found in the archive. One will also find an explanation of special constraints, in particular those pertaining to fixed format For further details on data entry, where different, one will refer to chapter 25 below.
A synopsis of the Main Roster is given separately.
Whenever entries are subjected to a special format, the constraints that apply are described below. “Local” notes, i.e. notes that qualify entries subjected to fixed format, may be given at any time, and are preceded by the @ sign following the entry as required by the fixed format rules. For other limitations on data structure see below, chapter … .
It applies to elements which
have duplicate labels, generally as a result of a switch in books or of an error
in recording (e.g., when two items are given the same label at different points
in time by two different recorders).
Fixed format: only one label may be given.
This applies to a label which is identical to one or more
other labels. It differs from A1 because the labels belong to distinct and
equally valid categories, and because one label subsumes several labels.
This is especially the case when a given element or referent
is subdivided into other elements, as a result of either further excavation or
more complete typological analysis. An example of the former is when two
features originally understood as two distinct walls (say, f34 and f42) turn out
to be portions of the same wall (which might be labeled f62, including f34 and
f42). An example of typological refinement might be a sealing (say i26), which
is then identified as showing the impression of a seal (say n3), of a cord (n4),
of a peg (n5). An example of a referent including elements is a view that
includes features and items.
In some cases, the result of typological analysis leads to
the establishment of an altogether new element, i.e., a join or an aggregate.
Aggregates are more complex and have their own set of codes (see below, category
G). Elements included within a join, on the other hand, would be listed under
A2.
Fixed format: several labels may be given, each separated by
a comma and a space from the following label.
This is the passive of A2, meaning that each element
mentioned in A2 appears in A3, under the proper element label. Thus, if for f62
the roster slot A2 indicates that it includes f34 and f42, then, under f34 and
under f62, respectively, the slot A3 will indicate that each is included within
f62. (In the input, as we will see in chapter 25, only the active relationship
is entered.)
Fixed Format. Only one label may be given.
Occasionally, special sequences may be used, e.g., for
temporary lists that acquire eventually a referential value and ought to be
conserved. This might happen, for instance, if a log is missing and a temporary
sequential list is established.
Fixed Format. Only one label may be given.
Separate lists are maintained for individual classes of
features and items, and the pertinent number is given here; more than one label
is possible. When needed, fuller explanation of the reasons for assigning the
element to that particular typological class will be found below under K12, K99,
M1-2. For example, a given item (say q103.1) is identified as a tablet. The
identification tb will be entered in the primary identification slot (B1, see
presently). At a later date, the epigraphist may set up a list of all tablets,
and this particular item may receive the sequential number 27 within such a
list; through further study, the tablet is identified as being a lexical text,
and it is given the sequential number 2 within a list of lexical tablets. In
such a case, slot A5 may be used twice, the first time listing ^tb27, and the
second ^tb-lexical2.
Fixed Format. Only one label may be given for each slot. If
more than one label is applicable, each will have a separate roster
entry.
The official publication number in the project publication
series (which is described in slot Q3). For example, the animal figurine K1.12
will show M1 209 in slot A6, whereas in slot Q3 there will be the reference to
the volume Mozan 1, p. 81 and Plate I.
broader typological category to which element belongs, e.g. ceramic vessel or metal artifact
Back to topA single brief typological identification of the element. Only one definition should be given. Where alternative ones have been offered in the course of ex-cavation and analysis, these are given in slot C20.
Generally, the codes given in the lexica (see below, 17) are preferred, e.g., cv for ceramic vessel. Such codes are not required, but are recommended for the purpose of easy sorting.
The alphabetic code used is the same as for specific labels (A5), but here no sequential number is given.
In the case of q-lots, no definition proper is possible, but only a list of com-ponents, which is given under roster slot B21.
As for any other roster slot, several alternative definitions are possible, of-ten as a result of a refinement of typological analysis. If so, they are not given within the same slot; rather, the slot is repeated as often as necessary.
Fixed Format. A maximum of 20 characters is allowed: this constraint is imposed only to avoid excessive length in a field for which sorting is of prime importance.
A finer subdivision of the meaning range of the definition. It may include multiple attributes: for instance an element belonging to the category "ceramic vessel" and with a definition "jar" would have a sub-definition that includes ref-erence to rim, shoulder, base, decoration, etc. These would be spelled out indi-vidually in the special roster.
Back to topA summary of what are perceived to be the most important aspects of the constituent in question, with reference to stratigraphy as well as to typology. The information given here must also be present in the appropriate fields below; for instance, a description such as "A long and well preserved bronze spearhead" corresponds to the following fields: length, condition, ware/material, function, where more precise information will be given.
This field is admittedly redundant. It serves the primary purpose of provid-ing a quick overview of data which, especially if considerable in size, may oth-erwise not be immediately apparent in their significance. Obviously, only that information may be sorted that is distributed analytically in the specific fields, whereas this particular field is not susceptible of sorting.
This is a row of up to four thumbnails from photos and/or drawings. It is en-tered in J file format as follows:
f 1
A12 L_V17d0102 J02v2 O630 jjj.jpg
The information about the photo may be copied and pasted directly from the relevant UGR page.
An image (photo or drawing) that appears in full size at the
beginning of a display page for views and photos of objects. [[[WHERE
IS THIS USED?]]]
Thumbnails of photos and drawings that define the full web
with the main view and all subviews. [[[WHERE IS THIS USED?]]]
Generally, the codes given in the lexica (see below, 17) are preferred, e.g., cv for ceramic vessel. Such codes are not required, but are recommended for the purpose of easy sorting.
The alphabetic code used is the same as for specific labels (A5), but here no sequential number is given.
In the case of q-lots, no definition proper is possible, but
only a list of components, which is given under roster slot B21.
As for any other roster slot, several alternative definitions are possible, often as a result of a refinement of typological analysis. If so, they are not given within the same slot; rather, the slot is repeated as often as necessary.
Fixed Format. A maximum of 20 characters is allowed: this constraint is imposed only to avoid excessive length in a field for which sorting is of prime importance.
Back to topA summary of what are perceived to be the most important aspects of the constituent in question. The information given here must also be present in the appropriate fields below; for instance, a description such as “A long and well preserved bronze spearhead” corresponds to the following fields: length, condition, ware/material, function, where more precise information will be given. Sometimes, this field may also be used at the time of field recording when time pressure may not allow to ascertain precisely to which specific field the information belongs. In such case, the data may be edited as appropriate at the time of data entry.
This field is admittedly redundant. It serves the primary purpose of providing a quick overview of data which, especially if considerable in size, may otherwise not be immediately apparent in their significance. Obviously, only that information may be sorted that is distributed analytically in the specific fields, whereas this particular field is not susceptible of sorting.
Back to topThis is a row of up to four thumbnails from photos and/or drawings. It is entered as a correction to the roster codes O2-O3 generated by the program that creates J files from photo/drawing directories
Comments on the choice of relays used to define a given feature. For exam-ple, if a corner of a wall is missing, one may explain here how the relays that were actually taken do define the perimeter of the wall itself.
Back to topThe sum total of components that constitute this element – such as the fragments that make up a tablet. The quantity of components for a q-lot would include all the typological subcategories, such as pottery or bones; the specific totals for various subcategories are given under the pertinent label, and are derived through the tabulation program (see below, 25.6 and 24.4). Thus if under a given lot q104 there is a total quantity of 182 components, they may be subdivided as follows:
|
Q\0104 qc
182 |
total quantity for q-lot: 182
components |
|
QB\0104 qc
12 |
total quantity for bone lot: 12
bones |
|
QP\010490 qc
2 |
total quantity for pottery lot, group 1 (for a
given ware): 2 sherds |
|
QP\010491 qc
48 |
total quantity for pottery lot, group 2 (for a
given ware): 48 sherds |
|
QP\010492 qc
82 |
total quantity for pottery lot, group 3 (for a
given ware): 82 sherds |
|
QP\010493 qc
11 |
total quantity for pottery lot, group 4 (for a
given ware): 11 sherds |
|
QI\010401 qc
27 |
total quantity for item lot: 27
pieces |
Fixed Format. Only numeric data may be given in this field.
This is primarily used for q-lots, which do not, in and of themselves, admit of a definition. Another possible use is for features, where given “inclusions” may be listed here – e.g., bricks and mortar for a wall, pebbles or ash for a lens. If any of these components is singled out for further description, it is listed as a separate element, as is regularly the case for q-lots.
An example for a q-lot:
|
Q\0104 bpi |
q-lot 104 includes bones, pottery and items |
|
QB\0104 |
bone lot 104 (to be further defined after fuller typological analysis) |
|
QP\010490 ROG |
first pottery lot: ware ROG |
|
QP\010491 ETC |
second pottery lot: ware ETC |
|
QP\010492 R |
third pottery lot: ware R |
|
QP\010493 WS |
fourth pottery lot: ware WS |
|
QI\010401 pebbles |
item lot: pebbles |
An example for a feature:
|
F\0091
ip |
wall f91 includes items and
pottery |
|
FI\010401
brick |
first item component of wall is a
brick |
|
FI\010402
pebble |
second item component of wall is a
pebble |
|
FP\010401
sherd |
first pottery component of wall is a
sherd |
Other than for local notes, which are added directly to a fixed format entry preceded by the @ sign, this roster slot is used for notes which refer in general to counting for the given entry, for instance, when certain problems are noted which affect the entire element, as in the case of a sherd bag that broke so that some of the sherds might have been lost in the process.
Back to topThe following roster variants refer to the preliminary descriptive attributes used when an item is first collected in the field. They are typically entered in log format, and attribution to this roster slot happens automatically when running the programs. they are preliminary because of the contingent situation in the field, when the items are dirty and must no be handled unduly and when there is often an element of urgency.
One reason they are important is to alleviate the difficulties arising from a possible loss of the label that is placed with the item at the moment of collection.
If upon cleaning in the house these descriptive attributes change, or if further typological study entails a revision of some of the attributes, then the new attributes are entered as a separate entry (under roster slots K3-9). In any case, a definition is entered again under A21.
BA1 field definition
BA2 field height
BA3 field length
BA4 field width 1
BA5 field width 2
BA6 field ware or material
BA7 field shape
BA8 field color
BA9 notes on field record
Elements are
found, referents are imposed. Recovery refers to the first process, and
assignment to the second: on the one hand we recover, say, a wall or a jar; on
the other, we assign a relay or a stratum. The record that is kept of these
activities documents the dynamics of the excavation.
This roster slot is used
especially for elements or referents that are subjected to a protracted period
of excavation: the resulting sequence of entries provides a history of the
recovery process. In the case of certain major elements, such as floors, or
major referents, such as loci, this can be an important window on the
development through which the identification process has progressed. As in B2,
this can also serve as a summary, sorted chronologically; in such case, it is
important that the analytical observations be registered as well in the
pertinent roster slots.
The difference must be noted
between this entry and the -dy entry found in the lexicon for incidentals
(see below, 17). The latter pertains to the entire area or book, whereas a C1 =
dy entry pertains only to the current constituent.
A description of the approach
to be followed, or the one that has actually been followed, in the excavation.
Here one notes especially the goals towards which the excavation aims, the
limitations chosen or imposed (such as the speed required under given
circumstances), the conditions which one may expect as the excavation
progresses. For instance, having come upon a congealed mass of bricks, one may
indicate that a determination of its origin is important, whereby the excavation
will proceed slowly attempting to articulate each individual brick; one may
assume this to be a brickfall that sheds light on the history of a presumed
building which may be at the origin of the brickfall, and that the face
alignment of the individual bricks may shed light on the direction of the fall.
Here, too, the difference
must be noted between this entry and the -sg entry found in the lexicon
for incidentals (see below, 17).
A detailed account of
stratigraphic or depositional considerations that derive from the data recovered
through excavation. For instance, if a given wall is deemed to be contemporary
with another, one would articulate here the reasons for that inference, such as
the fact that a given floor abuts both walls (which argues for their
simultaneous use, but not their having been built together), or the fact that
the walls themselves bond with each other (which argues for simultaneous
construction). This is also the place for presenting the reasons supporting a
given stratum assignment.
The manner in which a given
strategy is implemented, e.g., whether or not certain elements (such as bones)
will be collected systematically; the use of tools (large pick vs. small pick,
sifting, etc.); the number and quality of workmen employed;
etc.
If a given strategy has been
chosen out of several possible alternatives, which have been discarded, these
are outlined here. For instance, instead of a brickfall as outlined under
strategy, this may be the remnant of an outdoor brick making
installation.
A place to record unintended
events, such as a sudden storm or a workman going beyond the assigned
limits.
Elements are
placed at given points in space, and the three-dimensional grid with which we
operate allows us to establish a firm correlation between the physical reality
and the digital representation we construct. A locus is a broad referential
frame within which the excavation is bounded. More specific referential links
are obtained by linking elements to relays (which in turn are linked to
markers). Relays (and markers) are individual links that match physical points
on the excavation with dots on the grid, with an accuracy range of about 1 cm
(see below, 20). Such relays are combined into larger combinations that
describe, digitally and graphically, the physical reality that is being
excavated: these are the D-files and the P-files, which render for the most
part, as combinations of relays, features and clusters of
items.
It is especially
in this area that the application of a full fledged GIS and 3-D system will
alter the current technical aspects of the record. However, the basic concept of
a volumetric localization that is tied to absolute coordinates is already fully
present in the present articulation, and thus the methodological
presuppositions, if not the technique, will remain the same. In fact, it may be
said that the approach used here anticipates in principle the goals of a GIS
system and shows how to apply the substance of that method in the absence of the
necessary technical resources and expertise. Until those will become easily and
universally available, the system presented here offers a modest but effective
alternative. It goes without saying that the data structured in this grammar’s
format will be susceptible of an easy “migration” to a high level GIS system
when available.
The locus (or grid square)
within which a given element is found. Note that this is not the place where
observations about the locus are included (these go under the appropriate k
label for that particular locus): it is only a cross-reference indicating that,
say, a given wall is found in this particular locus.
Levels in the technical sense
described above (13.6 (1)) are not generally employed in our system, since
absolute elevations are used instead. A level would bracket the space between
two fixed elevations, e.g., every 25 cms from top down beginning at elevation
9850 (hence level 1 = 9850-9826; level 2 = 9825-9801; level 3 9800-9776;
etc.)
The number that identifies
the label of a relay attached to this particular element. Generally, there is
only one relay for items and q-lots, and several for features. The relay number
is entered automatically by the R program.
Fixed Format. Only one label
may be given. If several relays apply to the same element (e.g., to define the
perimeter of a wall), a different entry is given for each relay; they will be
sorted by relay number.
These slots are applicable
exclusively to relays (they are generally entered through the R-log and
processed through the R-program).
These values are generally
entered by the R program, which also computes the pertinent figures (i.e.,
obtains the actual coordinates and the actual elevation from field
measurements).
Fixed Format. All
entries are numeric
If there is something
particular associated with a relay, it is given here. This is the case, for
instance, when the relay, taken at the northwest corner of a wall (to be
identified as such under D9), shows a particular notch in the stone, or another
is taken at a particular point of a floor which shows a rodent
hole.
A relay is always related to
a given constituent, such as a feature, an item, a locus. The label identifying
such constituent is given here.
An identification of the
point on the constituent to which the relay applies. For instance, one will
identify as such the southwest corner of a given wall (identified in turn in D8
as the element to which the relay applies)
These slots provide a record
of how the pertinent numeric data (coordinates and elevation) have been
obtained. They do not have a current relevance, but serve only an archival
purpose.
Fixed
Format. All entries are either numeric (D14-D16) or limited to a specific code
(D10) or to a referent label (D11-D13).
The most common method is by
taking ties from known points. For more details, see below, chapter
25.
These are generally markers
(occasionally also relays) from which a tie is taken to establish the current
relay. The pertinent label is given in this slot.
The absolute
elevation read on a permanent marker is given here.
Numeric values in centimeters
for the distances between the current relay and the points identified in
D11-D13.
A file in which are included
the relays describing a given constituent. See below, chapter 20, for more
details.
Analogical sketches or
artwork (see below, chapter 22) are scanned and thus available as W-files. When
a constituent is included, reference to the scanned W-file is given here.
While volumetric
localization identifies the point(s) in space where a constituent is located,
axial definition identifies the position in space of the same constituent in
terms of its various axes. The first category (slope) stands by itself and it is
used especially for broad surfaces, such as floors. The other three categories
(inclination, orientation and rotation) are all correlative to each other and
are taken together (for details see below, 25). The directional point used to
identify the direction of the pertinent axes must be spelled out individually
for each category. Since the information recorded under D9 gives the location of
the relay on the element, one is in a position to duplicate the exact
emplacement of the element.
A generic indication of
slope, used especially for broad surfaces such as floors, and expressed in
degrees and the direction towards the lowest point. For example, “15 SW”
describes a plane sloping down towards the South at about 15 degrees.
A more
specific indication of slope, taken with reference to a specific (generally
vertical) axis. It must be used in concomitance with orientation and rotation,
and the various axes must be defined in relationship to a given directional
point. It is used primarily for items; thus, e.g., a spearhead may be indicated
as having an inclination of 45 with the tip of the spearhead being at the
lowermost point.
This is
also generally given in relationship to the same (vertical) axis and directional
point used for inclination, and is expressed in terms of the cardinal point
towards which the directional point is aimed. Thus, e.g., the same spearhead is
recorded as aiming with its tip towards ESE.
For
objects which are not fully symmetrical (such as a spherical object without
distinguishing marks) one should indicate the rotation of the item on itself.
For instance, a spearhead may lay flat in terms of its horizontal axis, but
oblique in terms of its horizontal axis. Rotation is defined in terms of a clock
position of the horizontal axis in relationship to the vertical axis, looking in
a certain direction and locking onto a given directional point; thus the right
side of a spearhead, looking down its shaft towards the tip, may be turned in a
5 o'clock position (if flat, it would be in a 3 o'clock
position).
The
definition of the rotation attribute was first articulated by Ralph Siegemund as
part of a term paper he wrote for an archaeology seminar I was
teaching.
This slot
may be used to identify in a shorthand sort of way relevant information which
cannot be expressed, for lack of time, in the more precise manner described
above. For instance, the fact that a bowl has been found upside down may more
easily be recorded by stating that fact here, rather than by attempting to
translate it into measurements.
Having defined the localization and the
position in space of any given element, one must observe the way in which
individual elements come in contact with each other. This is one of the most
important and powerful aspects of the system as a whole: if observed and
recorded systematically, these contacts build up the objective depositional
history of each element, and eventually lead to the establishment of a complete
depositional synopsis (which is a more complete version of the so-called Harris
matrix, see below, 26.5).
All entries
involve two elements, but the information is given systematically under the
element that acts as the subject in the relationship. For details (and one
exception), see below, 26.5.
A generic
category, through which one may describe the point of contact as such. Here, for
instance, one may record whether boundaries are merging or sharp, preserved for
the full extent of the element or not, etc.
This is
at the core of the observations about contact association. A range of
possibilities is spelled out in the lexicon (see below, 17), a lexicon that,
unlike others, is a closed and self-contained subsystem and claims to be
exhaustive, i.e., to include all possible types of
contact.
Four subtypes are distinguished:
1. Earliest events: whatever happens first, i.e., what the feature in ques-tion (as subject) does to pre-existing features
2. Contemporary events/Stationary features: the only applicable case is the bonding of two features
3. Contemporary events/Movable items: all events having a movable item as subject fall in this category
4. Latest events: whatever happens last, i.e., what other features (as sub-jects) do the feature in question.
Note that the temporal sequence (a depositional inference) is derived strictly from the nature of the type of contact (an emplacement category. This si further explained in the lexicon.
It is
indispensable to add, whenever applicable, detailed observations documenting the
nature of the contact, possibly referring to a pertinent photographic
documentation. For example, if it is stated that two walls are bonded, one
should indicate how this has been verified, and ideally one should refer to a
photo that documents the observation; or again, if one states that an ashy floor
accumulation abuts an unplastered wall, one should relate the observation that
the black color of the ash has been found directly on the stones, whereas a
subsequent, non-ashy floor accumulation, did not leave such color on the stones
(here, too, with reference to a photographic documentation). These observations
should be in the form of local notes after the fixed
format.
Fixed
Format. The abbreviated form of the verb expressing the type of contact (for
which see below, 17) It is followed by a space and a number corresponding to the
proper feature. Note that only features may occur as
objects.
A trace
(t) or a negative (n, see 13.3) are identified as such because
they have left an impression on another element with which they were in contact.
In this case, the contact association is physically observable, but one of the
terms of the contact is not. While the contact association is given in F2, the
nature of the inference requires a special explanation, to which this slot is
reserved.
While contact
associations are observable in and of themselves, non-contact associations are
observable only inferentially. To the former belong, e.g., a wall abutting
another wall; to the latter, two walls which do not touch each other but are
linked by a floor which abuts both. For this inferential process I use the term
“spatial aggregation,” while the term “aggregate” (see above, 12.3) refers to
the cluster of elements that are inferred to belong together. In the example
just quoted, the cluster of walls (and the floor that links them) form together
a generic aggregate (to which the specific term “room” might subsequently be
applied).
As an
attribute describing, e.g., a wall, this slot contains a reference to the
aggregate (which more specifically might be a room) to which the wall
belongs.
Elements
may be nested into a variety of aggregates. In such case, there will be several
entries, each with a different aggregate.
The entry
is generated by a program from a list of elements included within a given
aggregate (a).
An
association may be closed or open. In the first instance, all elements
constituting the aggregate are in indirect physical contact with each other, as
with the example given above of a floor linking two or more walls. An open
association, on the other hand, is interrupted in some fashion: for instance, if
the floor is cut longitudinally by a pit, the aggregation between the walls and
the portions of the floor on either side of the pit is broken, and the inference
correspondingly less firm.
The
inference on which the association is predicated is detailed here: for instance,
a group of vessels resting on a floor may be considered an aggregate, on account
on their sitting right side up on the same surface; their being isolated
vis-à-vis other objects laying on the same floor; their functional correlation
(jars and cups); etc.
If a seal
is postulated as a t element because of the trace it left on a mud
sealing, there is an inferred spatial association between the two. Under the
appropriate element identified by a t prefix, there will be a reference to the
i element that preserves the interface.
The entry
is given only for the t element, and is extended by the program to the
i element.
Fixed
format. Numbers without prefixes refer to pertinent element label, e.g. G11
45,33,65 refers to features 45, 33 and 65 contained in a given
aggregate
A full depositional analysis presupposes an even higher level of inference, and is not generally linked to individual elements, but rather to their overall interaction. Hence a depositional discussion is best couched in terms of normal text rather than in terms of the global record format described here. On the other hand, a depositional understanding is never absent all the while the excavation is progressing, and to this extent it must be made explicit. This can best happen in relation to the key elements which give rise to the depositional understanding in the first place. If we assume that a foundation trench has been dug to serve for the construction of a wall, the reasons for this conclusion can best be stated in connection with the feature corresponding to the foundation trench.
Back to topThe understanding of a given depositional process is described in detail; when alternative interpretations are possible, they are given, preferably as separate entries. The way in which the depositional process as understood conditions the excavation strategy should also be made explicit. For instance a vertical column of solid bricky material may be understood as a structural column or as pit fill: the case may be made for both, indicating what additional factors may be expected from further excavation to support either interpretation.
Back to topThe physical evidence from emplacement, which justifies the depositional understanding, is given here, as might be (however briefly) comparative information from the same site or other sites. For example, a foundation trench is so understood because of the slope of the side walls, the nature of the fill, the fact that the lowest courses of bricks jut out (as known from other buildings), etc.
Back to topWhen no physical evidence is available to support a given interpretation, but an assumption in its favor seems reasonable, the terms of the assumption are spelled out here. For instance, a sudden truncation of a floor surface may be explained assuming that a pit was dug into the floor, even though erosion has obliterated the contours of the presumed pit and no trace has been left of any fill within it.
What deposition is to space, strata assignment is to time: strata are non-observable realities, which are inferred on the basis of both observed data and of as-sumed interstices within the data. The definition and description of the stratum itself are given under roster slots B1 and B2, and the reasons for the particular assignment are given under I10-I11.
Strata sequences are tied to individual excavation units or areas. Hence a stratum must be identified by a qualification suffix (preceded by a hyphen) that contains the reference top the perti-nent unit or area.
In addition, since strata sequences are updated within the course of the excava-tions and of recording (see above, 2.15), the qualification suffix also contains a letter indicating the generation. Examples are: -JPA, -AAD, -A10E.
This entry is given for a given element, and it identifies the stratum to which the element belongs.
Fixed Format. Only one stratum label is allowed. If more than one stratum is assigned to the same element, as many entries are required as there are strata assigned. The reasons for the duplication are given as local notes.
Back to topOnly features are assigned to strata: since items and q-lots are associated with features, they are indirectly linked to the stratum to which the feature belongs. (An explicit reference to the stratum under the pertinent item or q-lot is produced by a program.)
Fixed Format. One or more feature labels are allowed, separated by a comma.
Same as for I1 and I2
Horizons are not technical constituents (see above, 13.1), hence they do not occur as independent labels. They are assigned to strata and phases within a text file, and the pertinent reference to a given element may be added here for the sake of clarity and convenience.
Back to topChronological determinations that are derived from external points of reference are given here, e.g., as a result of C14 analysis, or by reference to a firm typological sequence, or on the basis of a dated tablet.
Back to topGive details about assignment of a feature to a given stratum, from a strictly stratigraphic point of view (type of contact, absolute elevation, etc.)
Back to topGive details about assignment of a feature to a given stratum, from a strictly typological point of view (pottery analysis, glyptics, epigraphy, etc.). Note if there are conflicts with I10.
Back to topGive details about other reasons and especially about doubts regarding a given assignment, reasons for assigning a feature to more than one stratum, etc.
Typology
Different measurements may be arrived at depending on the time when, and the manner in which, they were taken. A first quick measurement of an object in the field may not be very accurate (due to lack of time or tools, such as calipers), or may turn out to be erroneous after cleaning. Some of these measurements may be discarded in the final editing, as they serve primarily the purpose of identification in case labels are misplaced in transit.
Back to topThe terms for each slot describe positions where the measurement is taken, and should be self-explanatory. Local notes should be used to make positions more explicit where necessary: e.g., the widths for a figurine or a complex metal blade may be more than three, and may not be taken at the same position in each case. In addition, one may of course develop a separate special roster (see below, 18), and one may also refer to measured drawings.
Fixed Format. All measurements for these slots are in centimeters.
Back to topFixed Format. All measurements for this slot are in grams.
Back to topFixed Format. All measurements for this slot are in liters.
Back to topAnalogical sketches or artwork (see below, chapter 22) are scanned and thus available as W-files. When a constituent is included, reference to the scanned W-file is given here.
Back to topSpecial descriptive files, in the form of a text file (see below, ...), may add relevant information to a given element: reference to the text file is included here.
It is especially for this category that Special Rosters may be used to supplement the basic information that is provided in the Main Roster: for instance, full descriptive variables for architectural details such as doorways, for artifact classes such as figurines, for written documents such as cuneiform tablets, for specimens such human or animal bones, must be accounted for separately. Thus, even such basic information as to whether a human skeleton is male or female will not be found in the Main Roster. Thus the variables provided in the Main Roster serve the primary need of expanding briefly the designation and identification of the individual items.
In most cases, a full typological analysis goes well beyond the limits intended for this system. The alternative approaches that we have developed (for instance for the study of seals and seal impressions or for the linguistic analysis of cuneiform texts), may go even beyond the compass of the Special Rosters, and fit instead within the broader scope of Cybernetica Mesopotamica (see above, 1.1).
Back to topA discursive description of the individual components (otherwise listed in B4). This is a shortcut, in lieu of making a separate file for each component, and providing then a description for each under slot B2 of each individual entry. For instance, a batch of pebbles found within a floor accumulation, may be described as to number, color and generic size (such as “roughly spherical, between 4 and 6 cms in diameter”). This would be a compromise between simply saying that there are pebbles, on the one hand, and making a separate entry for the component, with precise measurements and a more accurate description for each.
Back to topThis is an additional observation for components that are not analyzed under a separate entry: it refers to such factors as alignment or density. For example, of a batch of pebbles one may note that they are scattered loosely, but along a single plane.
Back to topDifferent degrees of precision are possible, from the initial field observation to the field house evaluation after cleaning to a specialized laboratory analysis performed by a specialist - thus going, e.g., from “metal” to “bronze” to “arsenical/copper alloy.” Dates and initials will earmark the successive stages, and identify their relative value.
Back to topTo the extent that detailed lexica are available for any given class of artifacts, this variable will be sufficient to provide a thorough coverage; see, e.g., the lexicon for ceramic shapes given below, 17….
Back to topWhen color is not matched against the Munsell standards, but is rather identified impressionistically, this roster slot is used.
Back to topThis roster slot is used when the Munsell reading is given. It includes both the color number and the Munsell color name.
Back to topIn most cases, this remains an impressionistic evaluation. When precise standards are used, such as the penetrometer for soil compaction (see below, ...), this should be noted.
Back to topTexture refers to an essentially impressionistic feel for the surface tactile qualities, which may be, e.g., smooth, granular, coarse, etc. We have at present a lexicon only for ceramic surface finish, see below ....
Back to topA reference to decorative patterns such as incised herring bones or color bands on ceramics. Complex repetitive patterns may be dealt with through a lexicon, whereas unique and complex decorative features (such as elaborate treatments of the head of a metal pin) are described with as full a prose statement as needed.
Back to topCondition refers to a qualitative, and preservation to a quantitative aspect. Consider the following examples. A pot may be preserved without a break, but be badly weathered: it will be described as whole (under pv) but damaged (under cn). Or it may be shattered in many pieces, which may or may not be reconstituted into a full vessel, the former being “complete” and the latter “broken” (pv); if the sherds show no blemish of the original surface, then the condition is excellent, even if the vessel is in pieces.
Back to topRepresentational items, such as sculptures or figurines, seals or seal impressions, should be identified and described as to their major figurative characteristics. The relationship between the two variables is flexible. Fort example, a seal may be defined as “animal combat” under if, and receive a specific code under is; similarly for a figurine, defined as “equid” under if, with a specific code under is. We use the term “scene” to refer in an abbreviated sort of way to the more specific type of definition. Finer differentiations, resulting from detailed typological study, may be treated either with special lexica or with additional variables in Special Rosters.
Fixed Format. For sorting purposes, it is best if the variants used for these variables are uniform, preferably in the form of codes. For this reason, the maximum length of either field is set at 20 characters.
Back to topA free format description of the iconographic content of a given object.
Back to topA free format description of the style of a given object, including formal preferences, expressive patterns, etc. Here, too, one may develop either a specialized lexicon or an alternative roster to accommodate a fuller range of descriptive options.
Back to topA combination of factors that together define the member of a group, and differentiate it from other groups. For example, a type of vessel may be defined on the basis of ware and shape. If a sequential list is established, then the label, inclusive of the sequential number, is given in A5.
Back to topMinimally, one may state that a given object is inscribed. Maximally, one may give a translation and appropriate comments. Obviously, a full epigraphic treatment requires a distinct roster, but ultimately a different approach (which has been pursued for the linguistic component within the framework of Cybernetica Mesopotamica, see above, 1.1).
General notes about the components (generally of a feature),
describing for instance combined typological traits, or inferences to be dawn
about dating.
Measurements and description analyze the element as it is in its static dimension. Manufacturing and function add a dynamic dimension, the former with regard to the constitutive process which has brought the element into existence, the latter with regard to the use to which it is destined.
Purpose of the global record is obviously to record the data from the excavations, so the Main Roster is not meant for any extensive treatment of either manufacturing or function, even less for dealing with ethno-archaeological observations. So these entries are reserved to record objective data, especially those belonging to emplacement which may otherwise easily be lost, and to propose minimal inferences which may especially help to understand the process of deposition that features and items have undergone.
Back to topIt is particularly important to note here evidence pertaining to architecture, of the type that is likely to disappear with time, such as shovel marks, which prove that a given vertical face is the result of a cut made into a preexistent matrix. Details pertaining to objects are also entered here, for example: some particularity of wheel marks on a ceramic vessel, the application of clay appendages to a vessel where the process is apparent and meaningful (e.g., two halves of a large jar joined after being made on the wheel), the use of a mold in producing a plaque, the type of drill used in making seals, a frayed stylus used in writing a tablet, etc.
Back to topSeveral degrees of specificity are applicable to the same element, depending on the level of analysis intended. The Main Roster provides only a first step in this direction, by defining two degrees of specificity, of which the second is further differentiated as to the setting in space or the activity it is meant to serve. These roster slots are used to justify such definition, especially when an evaluation of uncertain or unclear evidence is required.
If a sequential list is established, then the label, inclusive of the sequential number, is given in A5.
Examples of the first degree are a room defined as an enclosed space with controlled access through one or more doorways, or a jar understood as a vessel from which a liquid can be drawn by pouring. Example of the second degree would the definition of a room as a sleeping room or a jar as an oil jar.
Treatment
The roster
categories given below were developed in conjunction with Samer Abd-el-Ghafour
and
For other types
of treatment not covered in the Main Roster, see above,
14.3.
This
variable describes the conditions in which the element is found, before any
treatment. It is generally documented photographically as well.
Not all
the work that needs to be done can be done, or can be done at once. This roster
slot identifies what is potentially important, and helps to outline alternatives
and to establish priorities.
When work
has been carried out, the procedures actually employed are referred to here, and
the results obtained are described in detail; these are also generally
documented photographically.
If a mold
or cast has been taken, the label is given. If a remark needs to be added, e.g.,
about any difficulty in obtaining the mold or any particular caution that was
observed during the procedure, it is entered as a local
note.
A text
file that discusses in detail any other aspect of the conservation process and
that might not fit the roster slots given above.
Reference
Photographs and
drawings are referents that describe a given constituent in an analogical mode,
i.e., in ways that produce a full rendering of the constituent in question above
and beyond the analytical breakdown that has been obtained in the early part of
the record (and had been described in the roster so far).
Typically,
drawings provide an extrapolation of measurements, i.e., they serve as an
analogical equivalent of a set of measurements.
High resolution,
three-dimensional, metrical photographs go one step beyond, in that the
analogical record matches perfectly the analytical record, with regard at least
to a certain set of categories, in particular measurements and
color.
For view
entries, this slot records the template
For
element entries, this roster slot records the view that includes any given
element.
For views
entries, this slot records the secondary views available.
This slot
includes photos of items taken in the studio, after cleaning or any other
treatment.
These
slot include measured drawings, Autocad plots and schematic drawings available
for any given element.
A list of
individual labels referring to the specified type of elements. These variables
are applicable for views only. The letter “g” in the mnemonic code stands for
“graphic.”
Fixed
Format. In each case, only one or more labels are given, separated by commas.
The labels consist of digit only (e.g., 2, not f2)
O19 –
subviews
A list of
subviews, defining the web for a given primary view.
Fixed
Format. Only digits with pertinent suffix is given (e.g., 2a, not
v2a).
A list of subviews, defining the web for a given primary view.
Fixed Format. Only digits with pertinent suffix is given (e.g., 2a, not v2a).
Back to topThis slot
defines the relationship of secondary views to the main view. If the main view
is a doorway, then (in an inverse zoom sequence) a far shot would include the
whole room, a wide view would include the walls on either side, a medium view
would include the doorway proper (in practice, this is an alternative of the
main view, as when a different angle is shown), a tight view would include the
area just within the doorway, and a close-up a detail.
The
direction towards which the camera is pointing.
Photos
may require particular qualifications, e.g. when one wants to explain why a
photo of poor filmic quality is retained (say, because it shows a given detail
that has not been recorded elsewhere).
Note that
a general description of the view is reserved for slot
B11.
This slot
refers to a variety of other analogical renderings of any given element, besides
photographs and drawings (and also besides molds and casts, for which see above,
N4), for example holographs, wood maquettes, etc.
Disposition
refers to what happens finally to any given element after it has been excavated.
This category completes the process of recording for the elements viewed in
their physical reality, and facilitates any further study.
A feature
may be removed, and an item or q-lot may be intentionally discarded: these
choices are recorded here. For instance, q-lots that have been analyzed are
discarded, clay lumps that had been conserved for consideration as possible
sealings are also discarded, as are stones that are not worked and do not
present any particular interest as specimens.
As a
result of the “audit” which monitors the overall recording process, it may also
be determined that a given item or q-lot is missing, and this is also recorded
here. Ideally, then, everything that has been initially recorded, will be
accounted for in the record.
At the
end of the season, complete or otherwise important objects are brought to the
Museum, but all other items and q-lots are kept in the house for future controls
and study. This variable is then particularly important as it allows future
typological study of any recorded element, even the most modest, to be conducted
regularly on the basis of the original material itself.
Objects
brought to the Museum are listed sequentially, and that number is given here.
This entry also serves as an interim record of the very fact of transmittal,
until the official Museum number is made available to us for entry in the Global
Record.
When
available, the official museum number is entered here. This facilitates the
study of the original materials in their new permanent
setting.
Remote
laboratories generally have their own accession number: this is entered here for
ease of cross-reference.
Parallel to
disposition, publication completes the process of recording for elements viewed
in their conceptual reality. This category is the equivalent of a set of indices
for internal cross-reference.
Text
files are internal components of the Global Record in the sense that they are
available in the same electronic medium, even though they are quite distinct in
that they do not fit within a roster/lexicon system. Whenever an element is
mentioned in a text file, reference ought to be given here.
The logic
of the system, which aims for total integration of the analytical definition of
each element, discourages the use of any other commercial data base. Should,
however, any such data base be employed (on an interim base, or because of
greater familiarity with that particular system, e.g., Excel), then an internal
cross-reference ought to be given here.
It must
be noted, however, that once the data are fully integrated in the Global Record
with its emphasis on the ASCII format (see below, 36.4), utilization of the
archive with external programs is not only encouraged, but
expected.
The same
goes for meta-data banks such as the one being coordinated by
Etana.
Official
project publications are cross-referenced here. Note that the main entry is A6,
where the sequential number of the element in question is given. In the current
entry (Q3), only those references are given where a certain element is discussed
outside of it original publication place. In other words, this entry serves the
purpose of a thorough, general index to all references to a given element within
the official publications of the project.
Parallel
to Q3, slot Q4 provides an index for references to elements from our excavations
as mentioned in literature outside of the official reports of the expedition.
Obviously, this is selective, and conditioned by our own ability in keeping
up-to-date such an external source of information.
For the sake of
convenience, I give here an
alphabetical list of all the mnemonic codes used in the
roster.
=l A1 equals other
label
>a G2
elements (included within
aggregate)
>l
A2 includes other
label
>s I2
features
contained within stratum
ac
C6
accidents
ar
C3
argument
bo F1
boundaries
c# K6
color number (Munsell)
ca
J9
capacity
cl
D8 constituent label
to which relay applies
cn
K10 condition
co K5
color
cp K1
components (within element)
de K9
decoration
df
B10 definition (typological
label)
di
ds
B11 description (summary)
dy C1 daily notes
el D6 elevation
ga
O11 view of
aggregate
gf
O12 view of features
gi
O13 view of item
gk O15
view of locus
gm O16
view: miscellaneous
go O22
view orientation
gq O14
view of lot
gr
O21 view range
hd K7 hardness, compaction
ht
J1
height
i1
K12 iconographic definition:
generic
i2
K13 iconographic description:
specific (scene)
in
E2
inclination
ip
K17 inscription
lc D1 locus
lg J2
length
lv
D2
level
mm D10 method of measurement
na E99 notes on axial definition
nb K92 notes on (animal) bones
nc F99 notes on contact association
nd B99 notes on designation and count
nf M99 notes on function
ni K90 notes on items
nl A99 notes on labeling
nm J99 notes on measurement
np
K91 notes on
pottery
nq B22 notes on quantity
nr C99 notes on recovery
ns I99 notes on time sequencing
nt K99 notes on typology
nv
D99 notes on volumetric
localization
o# A4
other field
number
o1 D11
origin of tie 1
o2 D12
origin of tie 2
oe D13
origin of elevation
op C5
options (alternatives)
or
E3
orientation
ph O23
general notes on photos
pr
C4 procedures
pv K11
preservation
qc B20
quantity of components
rd
P1 removed,
discarded, missing
rf
D7 relay
definition
rl
D9 relay location on
element
ro
E4 rotation
rp
D19 reference to plans, drawings,
sections (W-files)
rw J10
reference to drawing (W
files)
sc
K14 iconographic description
sg
C2 strategy (projected
or implemented)
sh
K4 shape,
form
sl E1 slope
sp
A5 typological
specific label
st K15 style
sz
J6
size, other
t1
D14 tie 1
t2
D15 tie 2
tc
F2 of
contact
te
D16 tie to elevation
tf Q1 reference to text files
th
J7
thickness
tx
K8 texture, surface
finish
ty K16 type
w1 J3 width 1 or diameter of rim
w2 J4 width 2 or diameter of body
w3 J5 width3 or
diameter of base
wm K3 ware or material
wt J8
weight
zs
P2 storage
zt P3 sequential transmittal number to the Museum
The roster as
presented here has a double function. First, it outlines the logical structure
of the attributes that, taken together, define the properties of any given
element. Second, it serves as a guide for the input of observations in the
field.
Some of the
specifications given above, in particular with regard to format, pertain
properly only to the second function, and as such they should be found in Part
Three of this grammar. They are, however, included here merely as a matter of
practicality.