| Date | Author | Record | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0000-00-00 | gb | JO gives item numbers to what may be tannurs because it is uncertain whether they are in fact tannurs or jars. If tannurs, technically they would be features, as JO points our correctly, but for brevity sake we agree to keep them as items. He does however establish aggregates which include accumulation around them and content inside them. [Input: GBA12J.j] | |
| 0000-00-00 | gb | I will use the label AR to refer to the Royal part of the presumed royal comlex, i.e., the new building adjoining AK in A12. I will continue using AH for the house comlex in the pos-palance level, and I will us AP to refer to AK and AR as a single related complex. Even though AR and AP remain conjecturual, the labels are useful for the sake of discussion. [Input: ZG531ms.j] | |
| 0000-00-00 | gb | I will use the label AR to refer to the Royal part of the presumed royal comlex, i.e., the new building adjoining AK in A12. I will continue using AH for the house comlex in the post-palace level, and I will us AP to refer to AK and AR as a single related complex. Even though AR and AP remain conjecturual, the labels are useful for the sake of discussion. [Input: ZG617em.j] |
https://urkesh.org/MZ/A/A12/D/-INC/labeling.htm