1. OVERVIEW
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | !! | !! | buildup |
| Best definition | 0000-00-00 | jo | lens type a [Input: J716JO.j] |
2. IDENTIFICATION
Designation
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description (summary) | 0000-00-00 | jo | a layer of plant impression covers a general area of 120 cm EW x 280 cm NS, directly to the W of f96. [Input: ZG127ms.j] |
3. STRATIGRAPHY
Volumetric Localization
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | 0000-00-00 | jo | k6 [Input: J716JO.j] |
| M#/elev @top | 0000-00-00 | jo | phytholith layer [Input: J716JO.j] |
Contact Association
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of contact: earliest events | 0000-00-00 | ab | f110 (lens type a) covers f112 (accumulation C) [Input: J718AB.j] |
Spatial Aggregation
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aggregate (to which element belongs) | 0000-00-00 | jo | a17 (pavement), a21 (pavement) [Input: J718JO.j] |
Time Sequencing
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes on time sequencing | 0000-00-00 | gb | [sr] The main value of this feature seems to be that it serves as a stratigraphic seal above paving f96. It seems logical that the paving would have been kept clean during its use period, so that no accumulation would have taken place on top of it: the paving was too important to have been covered up while it served its purpose. As a result, this area would have developed a very minimal stratigraphic depth. The plant remains f110 are laid very horizontally a few centimeters above the paving f96. Thus they were laid there shortly after the paving had lost its purpose. I attribute this to the transition from a palace to a non-palace function of AK. [Input: J718OKK.j] |