1. OVERVIEW
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | !! | !! | installation |
| Best definition | 1999-06-13 | jo | wall [Input: ZG118ms.j] |
2. IDENTIFICATION
Designation
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Description (summary) | 1999-06-26 | jo | A12 corresponding number of A10 f164 [Input: ZG127ms.j] |
3. STRATIGRAPHY
Recovery/Assignment
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy (projected or implemented) | 1999-07-13 | gb | We do not fully understand the situation in the currently exposed portion of upper A12 (k8,k9,k10). We have stones and bricks/bricky material everywhere, but the overall pattern is not immediately evident. Following strategy meetings with MKB and with FXX, FAB, LKA we decided to expand A12 to the south and to open A13 to the east and north. FXX will take over A12 after jo's departure, and FAB/LKA will continue A11 on a much reduced basis and start A13. [Input: J718OKK.j] |
Volumetric Localization
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | 1999-06-13 | jo | k1 [Input: ZG118ms.j] |
| M#/elev @top | 1999-06-13 | jo | red bricks E to W at the center of the W half of k1 (E portion of f92?) [Input: ZG118ms.j] |
Contact Association
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of contact: contemporary events/movable items | 1999-07-06 | ab | q148.4 (clay artifact) sits in f12 (wall) [Input: J715AB.j] |
| 1999-06-13 | jo | q334 (bones, pottery) sits in f12 (wall) [Input: ZG1182ms.j] | |
| Type of contact: earliest events | 1999-06-29 | jo | f12 (wall) caps f81 (wall) [Input: ZG127ms.j] |
Spatial Aggregation
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aggregate (to which element belongs) | 1999-06-20 | jo | a6 (installation) [Input: ZG1183ms.j] |
Deposition
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition of process(es) | 1999-07-13 | gb | There is a problem in the fact that the eastern sections of this wall is shallow founded and does not match the eastern perimetral wall which is deeply founded. The problem is complicated by the fact that the lowest paving is lower than the bottom of the foundations, which means that the bottom of the stone foundations would have appeared suspended in mid-air. [Input: J718OKK.j] |