A Grammar of the Archaeological Record (Version 2, Beta release)

Hermeneutics

Beyond grammar

Giorgio Buccellati – April 2026

Back to top: Beyond grammar

Introduction

Back to top: Beyond grammar

The courage of competence

What we propose, and what we aim to do cocnretely at the site of ancient Urkesh, is to define heritage in terms that are arguably rooted in the record. “Heritage” is not a vague term that implies a simple acknowledgment of a past more or less romanticized – or even not exploited for political reasons. It is rather based on objective data which only the archaeologist can safely bring to the fore.

There is at times, when talking about heritage, a tendency to allow sentiments to prevail over evidence. This requires, as an antidote, that we as archaeologists show the courage of our competence . It is by proposing an objectively restructured and reconfigured record that the ancient perception can properly resonate with us. The record becomes then a diapason that synchronizes our sensitivity with that of the ancients – the proper goal of hermeneutics.

semiotics

hermeneutics

objectivity

Back to top: Beyond grammar

Examples post-excavation

  • The pride of the past. – The Letters from kids, Backdirt article
  • Identification with the place – music; projecting feelings; TPR MHR, school, park, lectures in villages

Back to top: Beyond grammar

Interaction

see interactional linguistics, Minna Haapanen

Back to top: Beyond grammar

Examples

the sound of Hurrian

beyond grammar – and yet within grammar: e.g. dating; naming

iconography in glyptics, figurines

Back to top: Beyond grammar