Roster |
Date |
Author |
Record |
Stratum (to which element belongs) |
2012-09-09 |
jW |
s180J3B [Input: W909JW.j] |
Phase (to which element belongs) |
2012-08-26 |
!! |
f582 (pavement, type b) [Input: W826JW.j] |
2012-09-09 |
!! |
h7fJ3B [Input: W909JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f42 (fill) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f90 (accumulation D) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f111 (accumulation D) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f116 (accumulation D) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f120 (accumulation D) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f209 (layer) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f252 (accumulation D) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
2012-10-07 |
!! |
f270 (layer) [Input: WX07JW.j] |
Strata (included within phase) |
2012-08-26 |
jW |
s180J3B [Input: W826JW.j] |
Stratigraphic reasons of assignment |
2007-07-31 |
mO |
under f570 [Input: R731MO1.j] |
2012-08-26 |
jW |
Several mudbricks which either top or are imbedded in the baqaya glacis, f581, to revetment wall, f569. [Input: W826JW.j] |
Other reasons, reservations, qualifications |
2012-08-26 |
jW |
Because this part of the glacis is quite small and was not removed to sample its constituents, the stratum assigned is an estimate. The only thing we really know is that the EDIII baqaya surface was maintained and kept clean for many centuries after it was built. So, the stratum for the mudbricks must fall between s650a (glacis) and the s160 (overlying accumulation, f570). [Input: W826JW.j] |
Notes on time sequencing |
2006-09-04 |
vVE |
The baqaya f581 and the mudbrick pavement, f582, I assign to phase 1 based on the assumption that there never was any major rebuilding of the baqaya-glacis and it therefore was phase 1 like the revetment wall f569. The mudbrick pavement might be slightly younger than the baqaya or is contemporary and the piece that was foudn is actually the border of a pavement that ran parallel to the stairs up to the temple. [Input: Q904VVE.j] |