https://urkesh.org / 72w-crit.htm  –  Version 1a, Not yet closed

Urkesh

Preservation

Criteria for evaluation

Giorgio Buccellati – August 2010

A chapter of the digital monograph: Site conservation




NOTE: on this topic, cf. also the dedicated topical book on “CONSERVATION”.

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Introduction

In the case of Mozan the initial impulse to conserve the walls was not preceded by any particular study, and it was rather carried out non only concurrently, but in close integration with the archaeological process. So the guiding principles developed more intuitively and on the basis of common sense than in function of a clearly spelled out plan.

As it fortunately happened, however, all the major criteria that are identified in the literature (see especially Agnew 2001, Palumbo 2001) were operative in one way or another. They are identified below.

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Protections

Salt, plants.

Invasiveness (intrusion).

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Site-scape: aesthetics

Accepting the intermediate stages (Bedouin camp syndrome…).

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Fruition

Stakeholders involvement.

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Site presentation

Presenting the document.

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Maintenance and management

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Costs

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation

Monitoring

UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Back to top: Criteria for evaluation