Interplanarity

Giorgio Buccellati – June 2025

(2) Interplanarity

see System Design below

see The Cluster intro

“Planarity”

The concept of “planarity” was introduced by Paolini

Garzotto, Paolini, Schwabe 1993

Schwinger and Koch 2006

Paolini 2022

Non-digital inter-planarity

Static

section in a printed text; figures

Dynamic

arguments developed by critical thinking

Theory

–> GRM –> The Data/matrix, aggregation/re-structuring –> Stratigraphy –> emplacement –> dD –> expand menu –> Conclusion

Bibliography

–> CAR –> Bibliography –> total, scroll –> left index: Kant –> monograph –> excerpts –> MEL –> articles by staff members –> fAB 2012 abstract full text –> scroll –> links within discursive A12/Typology/glyptics –> and within segmented: A14.239

broader implications symposium: HANDOU

Corollaries

Inquiry paths

It is in the nature of a browser edition to allow a “user” to follow unlimited paths as the inquiry process (or simply the curiosity) suggests. Thus to properly understand a given object one may explore first the stratigraphic setting (the accumulation in which it is found, the reasons for attributing the accumulation to a given stratum, and so on), then the typological correlations to other similar objects (e.g., all the figurines found in the same context), etc. All of this is available at the click of the mouse as one pursues the different links embedded in the original display page of the object in question, and then the subsequent links as they appear on each of the subsequent pages.

Where the process becomes more complex is at the moment when one seeks to group elements of given categories and to construct numeric, and eventually properly statistical, comparisons. A few preset inquiry paths of this sort are made available (and are accessed from the lower left column). They are the ones that are thought to be of a more immediate interest. Additional inquiry paths can be developed from the data base version of the data.

Browser edition and input