The Urkesh Global Record (Version 1, Beta release)

I. Theory. Broken traditions: the global record

The nature of the record – 2

Giorgio Buccellati – December 2024

Back to top: The nature of the record – 2

Globality – revised

The “global” record is such primarily with regard to emplacement. Once the elements are extracted from their locational context in the matrix of the soil they are be studied according to criteria that are not properly archaeological, but are of course indispensable to achieve a full semiotic and hermeneutic understanding of the data.

At that point, “globality” takes on a different quality: every single element that has been extracted from its emplacement must be identified typologically, however small and seemingly insignificant. It is what we called the “dignity of the fragment” (article). Accordingly, we may distinguish three stages in the study of the elements.

Back to top: The nature of the record – 2

1. Identification and basic typology

Elements are identified in 2002

Back to top: The nature of the record – 2

2. Refined typology

A16.117 elements within composite check somponents

A16.117 2025 addition by mKB in 2025

Zsi 2004 analysis

Back to top: The nature of the record – 2

3. Integrative analysis

sythesis in A16

article in MDOG p. 31 and 33

Back to top: The nature of the record – 2