1. OVERVIEW
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | 2023-07-01 | sC | lithic artifact [Input: ZH901sC.j] |
| Best definition | 2003-09-20 | !! | lithic artifact [Input: N920jw9.j] |
| Best image | 2006-08-29 | !! |
2. IDENTIFICATION
Labeling
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference to q-lot | !! | !! | q1242 (bones, pottery) |
Designation
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | 2003-09-20 | jw | lithic artifact [Input: N920jw9.j] |
| Description (summary) | 2003-09-12 | jw | large, almost cone-shaped piece of worked stone, although the cross-section at the base resembles a trapezoid leaning to one side. The surfaces are smooth, indicating use as a tool. It would fit comfortably into the palm of a large hand [Input: Nx26jw.j] |
3. STRATIGRAPHY
Contact Association
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type of contact: contemporary events/movable items | 2003-08-21 | !! | q1242.1 (lithic artifact) sits in f546 (accumulation B) [Input: N920jw1.j] |
Time Sequencing
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratum (to which element belongs) | 2024-03-13 | !! | s520A15A [Input: ZI901jW.j] |
| Phase (to which element belongs) | 2024-03-13 | !! | h4lMZA [Input: ZI901jW.j] |
4. TYPOLOGY
Measurements
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 2003-09-12 | jw | 10.55 [Input: Nx26jw.j] |
| 2003-09-20 | jw | 5 [Input: N920jw9.j] | |
| Length | 2003-09-12 | jw | 5.8 [Input: Nx26jw.j] |
| 2003-09-20 | jw | 11 [Input: N920jw9.j] | |
| Width 1 or diameter of rim | 2003-09-12 | jw | 5.1 [Input: Nx26jw.j] |
| 2003-09-20 | jw | 7 [Input: N920jw9.j] |
Morphology
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ware or Material, species | 2003-09-12 | jw | lithic [Input: Nx26jw.j] |
| Notes on typology | 2003-09-20 | jw | bronze [Input: N920jw9.j] |
| 2023-07-01 | sC | Usually the field and laboratory evaluations are similar, with the lab reuslts prevailing in cases of disagreement. Here the ware observations were radically different, but the lab conclusion that the item was made of stone is correct and validated by the photograph. [Input: ZH901sC.j] |
6. REFERENCE
Analogical Record
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photo of individual elements (studio) | |||
| Drawing of individual element (studio) | |||
Disposition
| Roster | Date | Author | Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notes on disposition | 2003-09-12 | jw | to drafting and photography [Input: Nx26jw.j] |