A12
Topical index
E
DITORIAL
Urkesh website
A12 website
Front matter
Current versions
Shortcuts
Introduction
G
ENERAL
Mozan sitewide
area AA
page layout
Grammar
A12
preface
authorship
versions
table of contents
A12 synthetic view
I
NTRODUCTION
A12 overview
chronicle
staff
input
errors
essays
topics
S
TRATIGRAPHY
principles
emplacement
volumetry
deposition
dep.history
phases/strata
T
YPOLOGY
B
UILT
E
NVIRONMENT
principles
structures
use areas
installations
loose elements
isolated elements
O
BJECTS
overview
ceramics
glyptics
figurines
lithics
metals
other
S
AMPLES
phys. anthro.
zoology
botany
other
bioarcheol.
C
ONSERVATION
principles
stone architecture
mudbrick architecture
the lab
storage
P
RESENTATION
principles
perceptual analysis
narrative
panoramic views
small panels
I
NTEGRATIVE
principles
comparative
historical
A12 tabulations
Introduction
Indices & frequencies
Synoptic tables
Correlations: interactive
Strat.summaries
Data set
Sitewide
A12 Indices
Introduction
All by definition (alphab.)
Installations and deposits
by definition (alphab.)
by definition (typol.)
by ware/material
by phase
by stratum
Objects and samples
by definition (alphab.)
by definition (typol.)
by ware/material
by phase
by stratum
Ceramic vessels
ware
overall shape
shape family
shape subfamily
shape type
details of shape
by phase
by stratum
by feature
Glyptics
documentation
external characteristics
physical characteristics
inscription
theme and composition
major compos. elements
minor comp.elements
filler motifs
secondary motifs
Click on totals
to see list of
constituents.
A12 Constituents
introduction
incidentals
a aggregates
f features
h phases
i items
k loci
q q-lots
qi q-items
qp pottery
r relays
s strata
v view photos
w view drawings
sequential
typological
data base
https://urkesh.org
/MZ/A/A12/D/X/XF/PH-FA.htm
Unit Book A12
The ābi (
Version 1a
)
Typological index with Frequency Computations
Installations and deposits
by phase
Processed on 2024-12-08
Included here are
stationary elements
or
features
, which can be divided into
installations that are set in place intentionally, and appear as either
horizontal surfaces
or as
ordered aggregation
, and
deposits that can result either from either
layering or buildup
, or else from an
amorphous amassment
.
Click on column headers to change sort order.
Phase
Total
Percentage
Histogram
h2m-MZA
3
1%
h2r-MZA
10
4%
h3b-MZA
56
24%
h4j-MZA
6
3%
h6z-MZA
11
5%
h7c-MZA
19
8%
h7m-MZA
12
5%
h8-MZA
95
41%
h9c-MZA
7
3%
h9m-MZA
12
5%
mkb mentioned that the pottery that was washed from the excavation of f307 and f308 appeared to be very early, Early Simple Ware. That would place this accumulation in Phase 1, Sr 18, the pre-palace phase. This is very interesting because it indicates that the apsidal structure a22 might not have been in use in the palace period because the accumulation pre-dates the AK occupation. It should be noted that this is a preliminary consideration because the pottery sample wasn't large enough to be conclusive, nor was the processing finished. We spoke about this with gb, and he suggested that the structure might not have been visible during the AK occupation. This morning jl, lr, ed and I spoke about all of these possibilities, and lr thought that it was unlikely that this structure wasn't visible because structure W was so close to the surface, and the brick fall and gully wash dip into the apsidal structure. See drawing A12w__.
1
0%
Total
232
100%
h2m-MZA
f353
f354
f355
Total: 3
h2r-MZA
f315
f346
f348
f349
f350
f352
f375
f379
f380
f381
Total: 10
h3b-MZA
f286
f290
f309
f312
f326
f338
f344
f345
f351
f365
f366
f367
f369
f371
f372
f374
f376
f377
f378
f405
f406
f407
f408
f409
f410
f411
f412
f413
f414
f415
f416
f417
f418
f419
f420
f421
f422
f423
f424
f425
f426
f427
f436
f437
f438
f440
f443
f444
f445
f446
f447
f448
f449
f450
a38
a39
Total: 56
h4j-MZA
f273
f302
f311
f330
f336
f347
Total: 6
h6z-MZA
f308
f310
f320
f328
f331
f335
f337
f341
f342
f343
a35
Total: 11
h7c-MZA
f258
f259
f303
f304
f305
f306
f307
f316
f317
f321
f324
f325
f327
f329
f333
f334
f339
f340
f370
Total: 19
h7m-MZA
f223
f235
f274
f314
f318
f319
f322
f323
f332
f357
f358
a34
Total: 12
h8-MZA
f3
f5
f6
f7
f8
f9
f10
f11
f13
f15
f22
f25
f26
f27
f28
f29
f30
f31
f33
f34
f36
f38
f39
f40
f68
f70
f71
f72
f76
f77
f78
f79
f85
f91
f92
f93
f94
f95
f98
f103
f104
f105
f106
f109
f111
f113
f114
f117
f118
f120
f122
f123
f124
f126
f127
f128
f129
f132
f134
f135
f137
f139
f141
f143
f144
f147
f148
f150
f152
f155
f156
f160
f161
f162
f168
f178
f181
f182
a1
a2
a3
a4
a5
a6
a7
a8
a9
a10
a11
a12
a13
a14
a15
a18
a19
Total: 95
h9c-MZA
f360
f361
f362
f363
f364
f368
f373
Total: 7
h9m-MZA
f1
f2
f18
f21
f23
f74
f75
f100
f234
f313
f356
f404
Total: 12
mkb mentioned that the pottery that was washed from the excavation of f307 and f308 appeared to be very early, Early Simple Ware. That would place this accumulation in Phase 1, Sr 18, the pre-palace phase. This is very interesting because it indicates that the apsidal structure a22 might not have been in use in the palace period because the accumulation pre-dates the AK occupation. It should be noted that this is a preliminary consideration because the pottery sample wasn't large enough to be conclusive, nor was the processing finished. We spoke about this with gb, and he suggested that the structure might not have been visible during the AK occupation. This morning jl, lr, ed and I spoke about all of these possibilities, and lr thought that it was unlikely that this structure wasn't visible because structure W was so close to the surface, and the brick fall and gully wash dip into the apsidal structure. See drawing A12w__.
a32
Total: 1