Roster |
Date |
Author |
Record |
Type of contact: latest events |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f10 (apron) abuts f11 (wall) [Input: P824GM.j] |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f49 (accumulation C) abuts f11 (wall) [Input: P824GM.j] |
2005-09-18 |
rE |
f70 (accumulation) abuts f11 (wall) [Input: Q301JW.j] |
2005-09-18 |
rE |
f94 (fill) abuts f11 (wall) [Input: Q301JW.j] |
2012-04-14 |
jW |
f370 (floor, type b) abuts f11 (wall) [Input: W414JW.j] |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f9 (accumulation D) covers f11 (wall) [Input: P824GM.j] |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f32 (packing) covers f11 (wall) [Input: P824GM.j] |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f51 (packing) covers f11 (wall) [Input: P824GM.j] |
Type of contact: contemporary events/movable items |
2005-09-18 |
rE |
f11 (wall) bonds with f66 (isolated stone) [Input: Q301JW.j] |
2005-09-18 |
rE |
f11 (wall) bonds with f67 (isolated stone) [Input: Q301JW.j] |
2005-09-18 |
rE |
f11 (wall) bonds with f80 (packing) [Input: Q301JW.j] |
2005-08-06 |
rE |
q12.1 (lithic artifact) sits in f11 (wall) [Input: P807GM.j] |
2005-08-09 |
gM |
q17.3 (lithic artifact) sits in f11 (wall) [Input: P809GM2.j] |
2006-08-16 |
bL |
q175.1 (lithic artifact) sits in f11 (wall) [Input: Q921EDB.j] |
2006-09-05 |
aA |
q306.2 (lithic artifact) sits in f11 (wall) [Input: Q921EDB.j] |
2006-09-15 |
bL |
q402.1 (lithic artifact) sits in f11 (wall) [Input: Q921EDB.j] |
Type of contact: earliest events |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f11 (wall) abuts f10 (apron) [Input: P824GM.j] |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f11 (wall) abuts f70 (accumulation) [Input: P824GM.j] |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f11 (wall) abuts f80 (packing) [Input: P824GM.j] |
2005-08-22 |
rE |
f11 (wall) abuts f94 (fill) [Input: P824GM.j] |
Notes on contact association |
2005-08-18 |
jW |
Continued to carefully excavate the relationship between the monumental wall, f11, and a mass of large stones, f39, f40, that are adjacent on its south side. The issue is whether they form a buttress at a turn in the wall or whether they are part of a large group of fallen stones, either from the second millennium additions to the wall or from some other structure higher on the temple mound. When the accumulation surrounding the stones, f47, was completely removed, we found the stones neither abutted or bonded with the wall. [Input: P818JW1.j] |
Roster |
Date |
Author |
Record |
Evidence |
2005-08-18 |
jW |
We conclude that the stones were carried down from above at some time later than the second millennium additions to wall, f11, were made. This is confirmed by the discovery of a large "dent" in the hard, gray, ashy accumulation, f43, which seals lower accumulations where the largest stone, f40, fell. [Input: P818JW1.j] |
Notes on deposition |
2005-08-18 |
jW |
The massive perimeter wall of the BA temple mound, in locus k101, was constructed in at least two phases. The first, believed to have been constructed in the third millennium consists of large, rough, stones laid with a mud and small stone mortar. The second, believed to have been constructed in the second millennium consists of large stones, cut into blocks, and laid atop packing, f42, which seems to have been spread over the third millennium wall. The part of the south face which we see consists of two courses of stones with a stone and mud mortar fill. The stones appear to be about 25cm thick, and seem to be laid form a smoother weather surface than the larger, rough stones behind them to the north. [Input: P818JW1.j] |