Back to top: Introduction
Option 1
MCV views are to numbered sequentially
MCVv500 for monitoring beginning in 2025
or else, omit MCVv and refer to unit:
| V23Oc0101
| BA-cv
| Zj806
| aMA
|
| checklist
|
| V23Oc0106
| J2-cv
| Zj806
| aMA
|
| checklist
|
as an example, here is sample sequence
| V15d7511 | MCVv... | M922 | sb | Zco... | test_on_mortar_just_made
|
| V15d7501 | A12.149 | M914 | sb | Zco...
|
| V16d7001 | MCVv1 | N709 | jlw | Zcs1:df | north_lip
|
| V16d7017 | MCVv2 | N711 | jjj | Zcs6:an | foxhole
|
| V17d9001 | MCVv3 | O821 | gb | Zcs4:wf
|
| V18d8003 | MCVv4 | P818 | dM | Zcs2:sc | scaffolding under construction
|
| V19i3901 | MCVv5 | Q928 | BML | Zcs1:st | wall stabilization
|
V19i0101 [under illegal folders] | MCVv6 | Qx03 | bML | Zcs1:md
|
Back to top: Introduction
Option 2
What we did in 2025 was to just write the unit or area code followed by -cv, e. g.
“V23Pc0101 BA-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0102 BA-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0103 BA-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0104 BA-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0105 BA-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0106 J2-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0107 J2-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0108 J2-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0109 J2-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0110 J1-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0111 J1-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0112 J1-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
“V23Pc0113 J1-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG”
Should we change, e. g.
V23Pc0101 BA-cv Zk201 aMA.JPG
to
V23Pc0101 MCVv500 Zk201 aMA BA-cv.JPG ?
Back to top: Introduction